A deep dive into GenAI-assisted underwriting
The RGA study used approximately 2,000 underwriting applications, submitting them to DigitalOwl with various permutations of evidence. Evidence sources analyzed included:
- Life insurance applications
- Medical billing histories
- ExamOne LabPiQture®
- Electronic health records (EHR)
- Attending physician statements (APS)
- Insurance lab tests
The output identified 40 key impairments, assigning each a mortality severity rating. This granular analysis allowed researchers to conduct multiple pairwise comparisons, evaluating the effectiveness of different types of underwriting evidence in identifying key impairments.
Digital vs. traditional evidence: A comparative analysis
While digital evidence sources showed significant promise, the study also compared their effectiveness to traditional underwriting methods. The results revealed that APS and insurance lab data still captured more impairments than digital sources alone.
This finding underscores the continued importance of comprehensive evidence gathering in underwriting and suggests that an ideal approach may be a hybrid model, combining the speed and efficiency of digital sources with the depth and detail of traditional evidence.
The future of underwriting: AI-assisted and data-driven
The RGA study represents a significant step forward in understanding how GenAI can enhance the underwriting process. By enabling large-scale, systematic analysis of protective value, these tools are paving the way for more efficient, accurate, and cost-effective underwriting decisions.
As GenAI models continue to advance, their ability to interpret complex medical data will only increase.
This progression could lead to even more nuanced underwriting processes, potentially allowing insurers to distinguish the relative importance of various evidence types at the impairment level.
Conclusion: Embracing the GenAI revolution in insurance
The RGA case study demonstrates the immense potential of GenAI-assisted underwriting to transform how risk is assessed and managed. By harnessing the power of these tools, insurers can streamline processes and gain deeper insights into applicants' health profiles.
However, while AI shows great promise, it is not a complete replacement for human expertise. The most effective approach will likely be a synergy between AI capabilities and human judgment, combining the efficiency and pattern recognition of machines with the nuanced understanding and decision-making skills of experienced underwriters.
Moving forward, continued research and development in this field will be crucial. The insurance industry must remain adaptable, embracing new technologies while maintaining the fundamental principles of accurate risk assessment and fair pricing. Those who can effectively leverage GenAI-assisted underwriting may find themselves at a significant competitive advantage, better equipped to serve their clients and manage risk in an increasingly complex world.
RGA is unlocking the future of underwriting through data analytics and technology. Learn more about digital underwriting optimization.