Responsibility
  • Research and White Papers
  • February 2026

Climate Change Mortality Risk: United Kingdom

The impact of climate change on future mortality in the UK

Flooded street by London flats
In Brief

In this review, RGA's Chris Falkous assesses the possible impact climate change could have on future mortality in the UK by 2050. The overall impact of quantifiable physical risks on mortality in the UK is anticipated to be a relatively modest reduction to mortality. However, some risks that are currently too uncertain to be quantified could have a materially negative impact on mortality.

Key takeaways

  • For physical risks where the change could be estimated, two key risks from climate change were identified: increasing average temperatures could reduce mortality by 0.4%-0.5%, depending on the scenario, whereas reduced air pollution could reduce mortality by 1.3%. 
  • The overall impact of climate change physical risks on mortality in the UK is anticipated to be relatively modest, with annual population deaths potentially reduced by around 1.5%-1.6% in 2050, depending on the scenario.
  • However, transition policies could have a significant impact. The transition to a lower-carbon economy could have economic consequences that positively or negatively impact mortality, but it is not possible to quantify this because of the significant uncertainties involved.
  • Transition policies could also have a significant positive impact on diet and active travel, leading to improved health and lower mortality, although this could be difficult to achieve, as it would require widespread behavioral change and significant infrastructure investment.

 

The key physical risks that could impact future mortality considered in this report are:

  • Change in average temperatures
  • Noncompensable heat stress
  • Air pollution
  • Droughts
  • Floods (extreme rainfall)
  • Food insecurity
  • Vector-borne diseases
  • Tropical cyclones, storm surges (coastal flooding), and sea level rise

The paper also explores the potential impact associated with transition policies that could  affect the economy or improve diet and active travel.

Table 1 summarizes how the physical risks of climate change that we are able to estimate might impact UK mortality by 2050. These results do not include the effect of population aging and, thus, reflect the impact of physical risks on the overall mortality rate of the population assuming its demographic profile remains unchanged. We are unable to quantify the potential change in relation to the impact of food insecurity, which we might expect to increase annual population deaths.

For a breakdown of how these figures were derived, read the complete paper.

Businessman looking at watch on a London street
As insurers struggle to assess mortality risks in a warming world, thoughtful analysis is essential. In a new report, RGA focuses on mortality impacts in the UK and delivers timely insights applicable to all markets.

Caveats and other considerations

Climate science has improved significantly over recent decades, but uncertainty remains.

We must acknowledge that some risks are too uncertain to quantify given the research currently available, and these could have a significant impact.

Most research about the impact of climate change on mortality does not allow for the adaptation we will likely see as society works to lessen the impact of these negative risks. An example of this would be the rollout of new malaria vaccines, which could reduce the impact of climate change on the spread of vector-borne malaria. Note that scope for adaptation against climate-related physical risks is generally greatest for higher socioeconomic groups.

This paper has concentrated on the direct mortality impacts of physical risks, but these risks could cause new-onset morbidity, and there could be negative mortality impacts from this in the future. An example would be the negative mental health consequences of extreme weather events for those who lose their homes or livelihoods and are displaced.

Even if the impact of climate change on future mortality were relatively modest for the UK, other countries may see greater impacts, which may lead to inward migration to the UK, placing a strain on public services such as healthcare.

We have considered emissions scenarios up to 2050. Over longer periods, the mortality impact could be greater, particularly in high-emission scenarios.

We have considered each physical risk in isolation, but reality is more complex, and interactions between risks increases uncertainty. There is also the risk of reaching climate tipping points, which could lead to a self-reinforcing cycle of increased greenhouse gas emissions and warming.

Some of the actions that have led to climate change, such as deforestation, bring humans and animals closer into contact, which increases the risk of zoonotic disease transmission and future pandemics.

Conclusion

The relatively modest positive mortality impact from currently quantifiable physical risks may be counter to expectations of a negative impact on mortality. However, some risks that are currently too uncertain to be quantified could have a materially negative impact on mortality. 

This modest impact from quantifiable physical risks in the UK outlined in this paper does not absolve society from taking action to limit greenhouse gas emissions and future climate change impacts. Climate change remains a significant risk factor and a priority issue that must be addressed through collective action at the governmental, corporate, and individual levels. The insurance industry has an opportunity to play a leadership role in combatting the climate crisis by promoting awareness, providing education, and inspiring, motivating, and incentivizing populations to modify behaviors in ways that will benefit their health as well as the planet’s.

RGA has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the information provided in this publication is accurate at the time of inclusion and accepts no liability for any inaccuracies or omissions. The information provided is intended for general discussion and education purposes only and should not be relied upon for making specific decisions.


More Like This...

Meet the Authors & Experts

Chris Falkous Professional Headshot
Author
Chris Falkous
Vice President, Senior Biometric Insights Actuary, Global R&D