Behavioral Science
  • Articles
  • September 2025

Effective Disability Claims: A partnership case study

Dad holding a kid over his head as a superhero
In Brief

A recent partnership between RGA and Australian insurer Acenda highlights how leveraging behavioral science can improve the disability claims experience.

Key takeaways

  • A recent RGA partnership with Australian life insurer Acenda leverages behavioral science research to help shorten disability claims and deepen customer engagement.
  • Embedding behavioral science techniques throughout the claims journey enabled assessors to uncover customers’ motivations and led to increases in goal-setting that promoted return-to-work behaviors.
  • As an added benefit, claims assessors reported increased engagement and job satisfaction themselves in helping claimants set goals and return to work, suggesting a potential business-growth opportunity.

 

This simple truth shines through in workplace engagement results for many organizations globally. For example, a recent Gallup study showed only 15% of employees worldwide feel engaged at work, with even lower rates in Europe (10%) and the UK (8%).  

If work that leads to a paycheck generates such results, how motivated to work are people whose financial needs are already covered?

Disability claims specialists grapple with that question daily. Tasked with helping claimants chart a course to return to work, they also must navigate a political and regulatory environment with strict guidelines for claimant engagement.

These realities led to an innovative partnership that leans on behavioral science to create a clear path for disability claimants to return to work. So successful was this approach that it was chosen as a finalist for an Australasian Life Underwriting and Claims Association (ALUCA) partnership award.

The following article details the partnership’s origins and goals, its results, and the lessons learned that other insurers can apply to simultaneously empower their claims teams and develop more meaningful relationships with their customers.

Building the foundation: From scientific study to business benefits

Research dating back to the turn of the century highlights how a long-term absence from work can be harmful to an individual’s physical and mental wellbeing.  Coupled with insurers’ desire to have claimants resume normal work duties, restoring a temporarily disabled worker’s health is – from a logical sense – a win-win.

However, human behavior is not always logical. Behavioral science addresses this gap between what people should do and what they actually do.

RGA’s Behavioral Science team launched a study in 2020 aimed at addressing the length of time claimants spend on temporary disability. It reviewed existing studies and found that behavioral science techniques embedded throughout the disability claims process to foster goal setting – often unrelated to work duties – can help shorten these absences.

Building from those studies, RGA tested its findings in a real-world insurance setting with a South African insurer. The focus was to confirm that behavioral science techniques could be embedded into the claims process so long-term impacts could be observed. This effort hinged on claims assessors’ ability to incorporate these techniques into their interactions with claimants – via phone, email, or text messaging.

The results seen in the original studies held true in the workplace. Approximately three-quarters of disability income claimants set goals in their claim forms, and claims assessors reported the revamped process had a positive impact on claimant engagement and return-to-work motivation.

Those results caught the attention of executives at Acenda, an Australian life insurer. Its executives were already familiar with what they knew as behavioral economics and how it could provide benefit to the claims handling process for insurers and customers alike. 

Woman excitedly looking at her phone
Learn more about RGA’s Behavioral Science team and how it can help your business grow.

The Acenda case study 

Acenda’s goal echoed that of the South African insurer and most disability carriers: to responsibly expedite claimants’ return to work. The main difference was the regulatory environment in Australia.

A 2020 Royal Commission found the behaviors of some insurers to violate fairness principles. In the wake of that commission, disability claims specialists had to balance strict adherence to new guidelines for claims investigation with genuine curiosity and responsible inquiry about claimants’ situations.

Acenda was searching for a means to be diligent yet sensitive to the political and regulatory climate while maintaining high-quality service for its policyholders. Behavioral science provided an important element to the answer.

RGA’s experts began working with Acenda on a pilot project in March 2024. The collaborative effort focused on a block of disability insurance business for which RGA provides reinsurance. RGA’s Behavioral Science team developed online training modules for Acenda’s claims assessors to give them a base understanding of the principles to be implemented. These focused on engagement frameworks between claims assessors and customers, as well as guides to turn conversations into goal-setting collaborations that promote return-to-work behaviors.  

RGA then conducted live training sessions with claims assessors to reinforce the tips and tactics. These claims assessors then implemented the techniques, with monthly RGA check-ins to refine the approach throughout the pilot.

The results showed its effectiveness not only on the claimants’ motivation to return to work but also on engagement and assessors’ job fulfillment. For example: 

Key takeaways for insurance executives

To glean further lessons from this pilot project, RGA reviewed a small cohort of claims in detail to search for common themes. Those claims illuminated four important lessons for insurance executives looking to incorporate behavioral science into their disability claims experience. 

Genuine empathy uncovers motivations 

A variety of factors beyond an initial injury can hinder someone from being motivated to return to work. The right questions asked with genuine empathy and curiosity can help claims assessors navigate past those hesitancies to find people’s true motivators. From that point, the right plan can help people reclaim their drive. 

The key aspects of this approach are twofold:

  1. Treat customers with empathy, focusing on goals they want to achieve (e.g. being able to play football again, go on vacation, or pick up their child). 
  2. Implement techniques to help claimants stick to those goals, such as planning and reminders.

The byproduct of success with this is often the ability to return to work – and often faster than if the plan had focused exclusively on return-to-work abilities.

Follow-up is crucial 

Those claims in the reviewed cohort where the behavioral science techniques did not have a measurable impact often lacked follow-up by claims assessors. Sometimes that was because of a change of assessors that disrupted the continuity of the behavioral science engagement. Other times it was because the behavioral science techniques were never integrated into the broader claim strategy or rehab plan. 

Follow-up is crucial. In addition, behavioral science education on these techniques needs to be a part of onboarding and ongoing education processes to ensure continuity when a claim changes hands. 

Give it time

Changing behaviors takes time, and time was a common theme in two main areas of this pilot project. 

The first is the time it takes for claims assessors to have goal-setting conversations for those on disability. They are, indeed, longer than similar conversations outside of this framework. But the interim survey of assessors involved in the pilot project found that a majority felt the time spent was a good investment to build rapport and create a better customer experience. Understanding that claims assessors will be spending more time with each claimant is crucial to promoting the change in workflow. 

The second area where time is crucial is the length of the pilot project overall. Behavioral science techniques need to become the business-as-usual approach for claims assessors. This takes time. It also takes time to gather enough data to accurately measure the effects of the trial. Six months is a good starting point, but the final duration should be based on the needs of the project. As seen in the cohort RGA reviewed, a shorter project commitment can keep these new techniques from reaching their full potential. 

Behavioral science can boost business 

The claims assessors who took part in this pilot project emphasized their confidence in using the behavioral science approach and reported meaningful engagements with claimants. This could play a role in boosting business growth. 

In addition to boosting disability claims effectiveness, it creates better customer engagement and assessor job satisfaction. Studies have shown this combination can translate directly into better business results. For example, a Gallup survey updated in 2025 found companies with engaged customers and employees enjoy 23% higher profitability than those without.  


More Like This...

Meet the Authors & Experts

Patrick Burke
Author
Patrick Burke
Head of Claims, RGA Australia

References

  1. https://teamstage.io/motivation-statistics
  2. Rueda S, Chambers L, Wilson M, Mustard C, Rourke SB, Bayoumi A, Raboud J, Lavis J. Association of returning to work with better health in working-aged adults: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2012
  3. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/236366/right-culture-not-employee-satisfaction.aspx