Data Solutions
  • Research and White Papers
  • May 2022
  • 5 minutes

TrueRisk® Life Population Study: A Study of TrueRisk® Life as a Mortality Predictor in the Contemporary United States Credit Active Population

  • Kyle Nobbe
  • Taylor Pickett
  • Vincent Prange
  • Hezhong (Mark) Ma
  • Kevin Peters
Skip to Authors and Experts
Image of airport departure lobby showing busy population
In Brief

In 2012, Reinsurance Group of America (RGA) completed its initial assessment of TrueRisk® Life in the United States. In a new study, RGA looks back and finds that credit data continues to be a strong predictor of mortality, even over the extended time period.

RGA’s goal was to understand the relationship between credit attributes and mortality outcomes. Given credit data’s successful implementation in analyzing risk in adjacent markets, like property and casualty insurance, it appeared to be an ideal behavior to explore for the life insurance market.

In 2014, a product version of a credit-based insurance score, TrueRisk® Life, was finalized by TransUnion. As discussed in the 2019 published article (Rushing, Kueker), RGA validated the newly created model by analyzing the risk score’s ability to predict mortality in the credit active population. In the decade since, the underwriting tool has proven itself to be a valuable asset to American life and group insurers. While not explicitly covered in this study, TrueRisk® Life has demonstrated, via studies of carrier insured blocks, to enable improved mortality risk segmentation and simplify the underwriting process, removing friction, cost and time to better meet customer expectations.

With the aim of building on the insightful 2019 whitepaper, this paper offers a fresh look at U.S. Population mortality trends. RGA studied TrueRisk® Life’s ability to segment mortality risk by leveraging a dataset from TransUnion containing 50 million lives, 6 million deaths, and 500 million scores. The study covers years 1999-2020 – a period made possible by a compilation of death sources, provided by TransUnion.

Armed with this new data, RGA has targeted key research topics including:

  • TrueRisk® Life as a Long-Term Predictor: This updated population study builds on the previous publication (Rushing, Kueker), following subjects for an extensive 22-year follow-up. TrueRisk® Life achieves 4.48x segmentation between the best and worst risks (1-5 and 96-100, respectively) over the study period (Figure 1). Performance would likely be even stronger if deaths were not disproportionally underreported for people with high TrueRisk® Life scores.
  • Score Performance in Recent Years: TrueRisk® Life continues to demonstrate strong predictive power when applied in more recent years despite a changing external environment (Figure 7, full report).
  • Score Persistence
    • Over Time: Distributions of population TrueRisk® Life scores are less uniform in 2009 and 2019 than in 1999, with increasing prevalence in the highest/lowest scores (Figure 2, full report).
    • In Individuals: Score persistence, the magnitude of score change for an individual year-over-year, depends on the initial risk. People with high or low scores tend to “persist” at their initial risk level, staying “favorable” or “unfavorable” risks for extended periods of time (Figure 13, full report). Age also plays a factor, with the youngest ages being somewhat less persistent than their older counterparts (Figure 12, full report).
    • Persistence and Mortality: Due to responsive score movements, even in rare instances of sizeable score changes, we see a corresponding impact on mortality experience (Figure 14, full report).
  • Scored People with Limited Credit History: Individuals with a limited credit history typically have very high scores (Figure 16, full report). The mortality segmentation for people with limited files is comparable to that of people with a more robust credit history (Figure 17, full report).
  • Overall Take-Away: Over the entire study period, mortality was over 4x higher for the “riskiest” 5% of study entrants compared to the “safest” 5%.
Figure 1:
Relative Mortality by True Risk® Life Score

  • RGA’s Take: RGA has leveraged its extensive industry experience with TrueRisk® Life to identify three key considerations for users and adopters:
    1. TrueRisk® Life continues to be a strong predictor of mortality, even over the extended time period in this study.
    2. While smaller individual movements will occur, score stability is very strong when considering ranges of scores that may be associated with certain underwriting rules. A large majority of individuals in the highest and lowest score groups remain within those groups when scored 5 years later.
    3. While a shift in population score distributions has occurred since the 1998 cohort in the original study, this shift predates the dozens of studies RGA has completed on insured blocks, whose relevance to carriers’ use of TrueRisk® Life is much greater. Consequently, the population shift observed in this study should not necessitate changes for carriers currently using TrueRisk® Life.


  Download the Full Report

More Like This...

Meet the Authors & Experts

Kyle Nobbe
Kyle Nobbe
Vice President and Actuary, Advanced Analytics, Risk and Behavioral Science
Taylor Pickett
Taylor Pickett
Actuary, Pricing, U.S. Individual Life, RGA
Vincent Prange
Vincent Prange
Actuarial Assistant, Actuarial Pricing and Research
Mark Ma
Hezhong (Mark) Ma
Vice President and Managing Actuary USMM Business Initiatives  
Kevin Peters
Kevin Peters
Vice President, Strategic Management and Execution, Underwriting Services, U.S. Individual Life